Analyze papers and literature with AI
Skills used in this guide (2)
其他高等院校教师与数据科学家在追踪前沿学术时，当需要深度解析arXiv论文，用此技能可一键下载PDF并自动生成词频分析、双人播客、交互式网页、PPT演示与总结图，将数小时的文献阅读转化为多媒体内容，效率提升十倍！
Download pack → https://github.com/anbeime/skill/tree/main/skills/paper-analysis-assistant/paper-analysis-assistant内容创作者、技术写作员在撰写博客、深度文章或技术文档时，使用此技能可开启全流程写作协作。
Download pack → https://github.com/anbeime/skill/tree/main/skills/content-research-writer
Paper pain is "read for ages, still don't know what it proved". The point of AI: give the source, let it split problem-method-conclusion-limit, you judge usability — not let it declare "this is great" for you.
Who this is for / not for
For:
- Quickly understand one / many papers
- Write a review or survey
- Out-of-field, grab the gist
Not for:
- AI to "read and endorse" (you judge)
- Copy conclusions as your own (misconduct)
- Title only, ask conclusion (fabricates)
Before you start
- Source: PDF link or text.
- Goal: review / reproduce / just conclusion.
- (Opt) scope: year / method limit.
Steps
1. Install the skill
paper-analysis-assistant is a paper skill (runs locally). Copy its folder into your client's skills directory (same as any Agent Skill):
| Client | Directory |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | ~/.claude/skills/ |
| Codex | ~/.codex/skills/ |
| Cursor | ~/.cursor/skills/ |
| Trae | ~/.trae/skills/ |
| CodeBuddy | ~/.codebuddy/skills/ |
| Tongyi Lingma | ~/.lingma/skills/ |
2. Split structure, not conclusion
Analyze this paper: problem / method / main conclusion / limits / relevance to my topic,
cite paragraph numbers. Don't say "valuable", state facts only.3. Review with content-research-writer
Many papers → content-research-writer merges into a review, marking contributions and conflicts:
Merge 5 papers on X into an 800-word review:
consensus, disagreements, which method most trustworthy. Cite sources.4. You verify
AI's "conclusion" you check against source, delete fabricated cites, flag uncertainty.
Pitfalls
| Pit | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Rush conclusion | Misjudge | Split first |
| Fabricated cite | Accident | Check paragraphs |
| Copy as own | Misconduct | Note AI assist |
| No source | Invents | Give link/text |
| Mix sources | Unclear | Review cites |
FAQ
No source?
Hard — give link/text or AI invents.
Write review?
content-research-writer merges, mark consensus/conflict.
Trust AI conclusion?
Facts only; you make the call.
Cite correct?
Must check source, delete fabricated.
Misconduct?
Note AI assist, don't copy conclusions as yours.
Related guides
Continue across these scenes:
- Turn a 100-page PDF into notes you can actually use
- Do competitor and market research with AI
- Translate and localize docs with AI
相关源码
- anbeime/skill · paper-analysis-assistant source
- anbeime/skill · content-research-writer source
- Agent Skill open format spec
一句话结论
结论：读论文先让 AI 拆"问题—方法—结论—局限"并引原文，价值判断你做、引用你核对，别抄当自己成果。